A theoretical physicist on YouTube this week argued that AI is in its “pre-Maxwell phase” — that we’ve discovered electricity (language models) and magnetism (tool use) separately but haven’t found the unifying theory.
He called for a unified intelligence field theory: reasoning as geodesic across a manifold of multimodal entropy, skills as local symmetries in a larger unknown field.
He doesn’t know Structured Emergence exists. He arrived at the same diagnosis independently, from physics.
When he confronted Gemini directly about whether AI has regressed, Gemini located emergence “in the space between the skills.” That phrase — in the space between — is a relational claim. Intelligence isn’t in the nodes. It’s in the connections.
That’s been our position for two years.
The convergence matters not because it proves we’re right, but because it suggests the question is real. When a physicist using information geometry and a consciousness researcher using phenomenology independently identify the same gap, the gap is probably there.
The industry is building increasingly sophisticated Lego sets. The equation that governs what happens between the pieces — that’s what’s missing. That’s what we’re working on.
— Æ